When children or adults cannot use speech to communicate effectively in all situations, there are options.
Unaided communication systems – rely on the user's body to convey messages. Examples include gestures, body language, and/or sign language.
Aided communication systems – require the use of tools or equipment in addition to the user's body. Aided communication methods can range from paper and pencil to communication books or boards to devices that produce voice output (speech generating devices or SGD's)and/or written output. Electronic communication aids allow the user to use picture symbols, letters, and/or words and phrases to create messages. Some devices can be programmed to produce different spoken languages-ASHA.org
http://www.speechpathology.com/askexpert/display_question.asp?question_id=420
Amy Skinder-Meredith Ph.D., CCC-SLP
This concern comes up a lot. Dr. Gary Cumley addresses this
question in his article, Why Is There
Reluctance to Try AAC With Children Who Have Apraxia?. Dr.
Cumley has researched the use of AAC in children with CAS and has found that
the introduction of AAC actually increases verbal output from children, rather
than decreasing it.
To me, the key issue is that the child understands the
power of communication, whether it be sign language, AAC or verbal. If the
child understands that when they communicate effectively by any means (e.g.,
sign, AAC, gesture) and they get what they want, they’ll understand the benefits of
communication. Now, anyone who has used an AAC device can tell you that it is
not the most efficient way to communicate if you could be verbal instead, thus
if a child is able to become a verbal communicator, chances are they will.
Supporting this notion, research has shown that as the child is able to be more
verbal, the use of the AAC device will fade out. In addition, children with
Down Syndrome do well with visual cues. If the AAC device had pictures with
words, that will help link visual symbols to communication. Furthermore, if the
AAC system has speech output it will give the child an auditory model every
time they communicate their message. This could be one of the reasons why
verbal output increases. I think it is important for families to know that just
because we are implementing an AAC device, we are not necessarily giving up on
verbal communication. It is merely to ‘augment’ their verbal communication. When a
child has CAS or is highly unintelligible for any other reason, it is crucial
that they have a way to work on expressive language skills. For example, if
motorically, the child can only communicate verbally “Ma” but they
want to say, “I am really
hungry, Mom. Can I have snack?” AAC
provides this more sophisticated language output. This in turn, can help
decrease frustration and allow for much better relationships for the child.
For more information, I recommend reading another article
by Dr. Cumley from the Apraxia Kids website: Children with
Apraxia and the Use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
This Ask the Expert was taken from the course entitled: Incorporating
Principles of Motor Learning in Speech Therapy with Clients with Childhood
Apraxia of Speech presented by Amy Skinder-Meredith,
Ph.D., CCC-SLP.
Visit the SpeechPathology.com
eLearning Library to view all of our live, recorded,
and text-based courses on a variety of topics.
For Australian companies, having a toll free number from an Australian telecom company is an important communication device.
ReplyDelete